D - Syntax Q:
- Russell Lewis (3/3) Jan 21 2003 Which or both of these syntaxes are legal for declaring a varargs functi...
-
Carlos
(24/24)
Jan 21 2003
"Russell Lewis"
- Russell Lewis (8/18) Jan 21 2003 That was my thought, though I wanted Walter to confirm it.
-
Carlos
(33/33)
Jan 21 2003
"Russell Lewis"
- Andrew Edwards (1/7) Jan 21 2003 No...It does not work.
Which or both of these syntaxes are legal for declaring a varargs function?
void foo(char a, ...) {;};
void foo(char a...) {;};
Jan 21 2003
"Russell Lewis" <spamhole-2001-07-16 deming-os.org> escribió en el mensaje
news:3E2DA027.8070308 deming-os.org...
| Which or both of these syntaxes are legal for declaring a varargs
function?
|
| void foo(char a, ...) {;};
| void foo(char a...) {;};
|
the first
-------------------------
Carlos Santander
http://carlos3.netfirms.com/
"Russell Lewis" <spamhole-2001-07-16 deming-os.org> escribió en el mensaje
news:3E2DA027.8070308 deming-os.org...
| Which or both of these syntaxes are legal for declaring a varargs
function?
|
| void foo(char a, ...) {;};
| void foo(char a...) {;};
|
the first
-------------------------
Carlos Santander
http://carlos3.netfirms.com/
Jan 21 2003
Carlos wrote:
"Russell Lewis" <spamhole-2001-07-16 deming-os.org> escribió en el mensaje
news:3E2DA027.8070308 deming-os.org...
| Which or both of these syntaxes are legal for declaring a varargs
function?
|
| void foo(char a, ...) {;};
| void foo(char a...) {;};
|
the first
That was my thought, though I wanted Walter to confirm it.
Also, if anybody has the latest version of DMD, can you check things:
* Does DMD allow you to use the 2nd syntax?
* Does the declaration of
char[] fmt(char[] format, generic[] args...)
in phobos/format.d still use the 2nd syntax? I have an old copy of
phobos (the one I got when I installed DLI 0.1.2), and it has that.
Jan 21 2003
"Carlos" <carlos8294 msn.com>
"Russell Lewis" <spamhole-2001-07-16 deming-os.org> escribió en el mensaje
news:3E2DA498.30209 deming-os.org...
| Carlos wrote:
| > "Russell Lewis" <spamhole-2001-07-16 deming-os.org> escribió en el
mensaje
| > news:3E2DA027.8070308 deming-os.org...
| > | Which or both of these syntaxes are legal for declaring a varargs
| > function?
| > |
| > | void foo(char a, ...) {;};
| > | void foo(char a...) {;};
| > |
| >
| > the first
|
| That was my thought, though I wanted Walter to confirm it.
|
| Also, if anybody has the latest version of DMD, can you check things:
| * Does DMD allow you to use the 2nd syntax?
no, it doesn't
| * Does the declaration of
| char[] fmt(char[] format, generic[] args...)
| in phobos/format.d still use the 2nd syntax? I have an old copy of
| phobos (the one I got when I installed DLI 0.1.2), and it has that.
|
dli supports that, but dmd doesn't, AFAIR
-------------------------
Carlos Santander
http://carlos3.netfirms.com/
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.445 / Virus Database: 250 - Release Date: 2003-01-21
Jan 21 2003
Also, if anybody has the latest version of DMD, can you check things:
* Does DMD allow you to use the 2nd syntax?
* Does the declaration of
char[] fmt(char[] format, generic[] args...)
in phobos/format.d still use the 2nd syntax? I have an old copy of
phobos (the one I got when I installed DLI 0.1.2), and it has that.
No...It does not work.
Jan 21 2003