Archives
D Programming
DD.gnu digitalmars.D digitalmars.D.bugs digitalmars.D.dtl digitalmars.D.dwt digitalmars.D.announce digitalmars.D.learn digitalmars.D.debugger C/C++ Programming
c++c++.announce c++.atl c++.beta c++.chat c++.command-line c++.dos c++.dos.16-bits c++.dos.32-bits c++.idde c++.mfc c++.rtl c++.stl c++.stl.hp c++.stl.port c++.stl.sgi c++.stlsoft c++.windows c++.windows.16-bits c++.windows.32-bits c++.wxwindows digitalmars.empire digitalmars.DMDScript electronics |
c++ - Template template support ?
Hi, Is DMC not supporting template template arguments ? The following code compiles ok with gcc 4.2 but not with dmc 8.42n. The error is "no match for function test3(...)". About the functions : - test1 takes a vector of ints - test2 takes a vector of objects T - test3 take a container C of objects T Regards, Cédric -------------------- sample code ---------------------- #include <iostream> #include <vector> #include <list> using namespace std; void test1( vector<int>& container ) { cout << "ok" << endl; } template<class T> void test2( vector<T>& container ) { cout << "ok" << endl; } template< template <typename T> class C, class T> void test3( C<T>& container ) { cout << "ok" << endl; } int main() { vector<int> a_vector(5); list<int> a_list(5); test1(a_vector); // dmc ok test2(a_vector); // dmc ok test3(a_vector); // dmc not ok, gcc ok test3(a_list); // dmc not ok, gcc ok return 0; } Aug 03 2007
Cédric Paternotte wrote:Is DMC not supporting template template arguments ? Aug 05 2007
Hi Walter, I've been investigating a bit and found a solution. The previous code compiles if test3 is rewritten as : template< class T, class U, template <typename T,typename U> class C> void test3( C<T,U>& container ) { cout << "ok" << endl; } Here the container template "C" has been defined as a 2-parameters template, instead of a 1-parameter template as before. Indeed, STL container templates take 2 parameters : the value type (which is mandatory) and the allocator type (which is optional and comes with a default value). DMC expected the second parameter (the allocator) to be explicitly specified in order to recognize "C" as a valid template template. gcc isn't so rigid in this area but I'm not sure what the standard is saying about this (MS VC++ 2003 behaves like dmc). Chears, Cédric Aug 15 2007
|