Digital Mars - c++ - Inline asm in naked inline C++ functions

Archives

D Programming

D
D.gnu
digitalmars.D
digitalmars.D.bugs
digitalmars.D.dtl
digitalmars.D.dwt
digitalmars.D.announce
digitalmars.D.learn
digitalmars.D.debugger

C/C++ Programming

c++
c++.announce
c++.atl
c++.beta
c++.chat
c++.command-line
c++.dos
c++.dos.16-bits
c++.dos.32-bits
c++.idde
c++.mfc
c++.rtl
c++.stl
c++.stl.hp
c++.stl.port
c++.stl.sgi
c++.stlsoft
c++.windows
c++.windows.16-bits
c++.windows.32-bits
c++.wxwindows

digitalmars.empire
digitalmars.DMDScript

c++ - Inline asm in naked inline C++ functions - fat??

"The Dr ... who?" <thedr who.com> Jun 13 2004

"Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> Jun 13 2004

"Matthew" <admin stlsoft.dot.dot.dot.dot.org> Jun 13 2004

"Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> Jun 14 2004

↑ ↓ ← → "The Dr ... who?" <thedr who.com> writes:

It seems as though DMC++ generates code for inline functions if they're
__declspec(naked) and have asm blocks, even if they're not used. Is this
apparent
phenomenon known?

Jun 13 2004

↑ ↓ ← → "Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> writes:

"The Dr ... who?" <thedr who.com> wrote in message
news:cah4re$29sp$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 It seems as though DMC++ generates code for inline functions if they're
 __declspec(naked) and have asm blocks, even if they're not used. Is this


 phenomenon known?


Yes. But if they are unused, the linker will throw them away.

Jun 13 2004

↑ ↓ ← → "Matthew" <admin stlsoft.dot.dot.dot.dot.org> writes:

"Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> wrote in message
news:caj1ii$1sut$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 "The Dr ... who?" <thedr who.com> wrote in message
 news:cah4re$29sp$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 It seems as though DMC++ generates code for inline functions if they're
 __declspec(naked) and have asm blocks, even if they're not used. Is this


 phenomenon known?


 Yes. But if they are unused, the linker will throw them away.


That happens at the time the .lib is linked to the .exe/.dll, rather than at the
time the .lib is formed??

Jun 13 2004

↑ ↓ ← → "Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> writes:

"Matthew" <admin stlsoft.dot.dot.dot.dot.org> wrote in message
news:caj8k3$29jk$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 "Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> wrote in message
 news:caj1ii$1sut$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 "The Dr ... who?" <thedr who.com> wrote in message
 news:cah4re$29sp$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 It seems as though DMC++ generates code for inline functions if






 __declspec(naked) and have asm blocks, even if they're not used. Is






 apparent
 phenomenon known?


 Yes. But if they are unused, the linker will throw them away.


 That happens at the time the .lib is linked to the .exe/.dll, rather than


 time the .lib is formed??


If the function is in a 'COMDAT' record, the linker will not insert it in
the exe file if it is not referenced.

Jun 14 2004