www.digitalmars.com Home | Search | C & C++ | D | DMDScript | News Groups | index | prev | next
Archives
D Programming
D
D.gnu
digitalmars.D
digitalmars.D.bugs
digitalmars.D.dtl
digitalmars.D.dwt
digitalmars.D.announce
digitalmars.D.learn
digitalmars.D.debugger
C/C++ Programming
c++
c++.announce
c++.atl
c++.beta
c++.chat
c++.command-line
c++.dos
c++.dos.16-bits
c++.dos.32-bits
c++.idde
c++.mfc
c++.rtl
c++.stl
c++.stl.hp
c++.stl.port
c++.stl.sgi
c++.stlsoft
c++.windows
c++.windows.16-bits
c++.windows.32-bits
c++.wxwindows
digitalmars.empire
digitalmars.DMDScript

c++ - Make

↑ ↓ ← → "Matthew Wilson" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> writes:
I think I've just determined that DMC++'s make does not handle the extended
make syntax:

{$(UNIXEM_SRC_DIR)}.c{$(UNIXEM_OBJ_DIR)}.obj:
    $(CC) $(CC_ARGS) -I$(UNIXEM_INC_DIR) -o$  $<

Is this correct?

If so, do you have a handle on how hard it would be to add? (I know, you're
going to tell me to add it myself, aren't you ... <sob, sob>)

Matthew
Dec 18 2003
↑ ↓ ← → "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:
"Matthew Wilson" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message
news:brrthg$2j61$1 digitaldaemon.com...

 I think I've just determined that DMC++'s make does not handle the




 make syntax:

 {$(UNIXEM_SRC_DIR)}.c{$(UNIXEM_OBJ_DIR)}.obj:
     $(CC) $(CC_ARGS) -I$(UNIXEM_INC_DIR) -o$  $<

 Is this correct?



Yes.


 If so, do you have a handle on how hard it would be to add? (I know,




 going to tell me to add it myself, aren't you ... <sob, sob>)



You could use smake <g>.
Dec 18 2003
↑ ↓ ← → "Matthew Wilson" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> writes:
"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in message
news:brrueh$2kll$1 digitaldaemon.com...

 "Matthew Wilson" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message
 news:brrthg$2j61$1 digitaldaemon.com...

 I think I've just determined that DMC++'s make does not handle the




 make syntax:

 {$(UNIXEM_SRC_DIR)}.c{$(UNIXEM_OBJ_DIR)}.obj:
     $(CC) $(CC_ARGS) -I$(UNIXEM_INC_DIR) -o$  $<

 Is this correct?



 Yes.


 If so, do you have a handle on how hard it would be to add? (I know,




 going to tell me to add it myself, aren't you ... <sob, sob>)



 You could use smake <g>.



Does that do it then, or are you just toying with me ?
Dec 18 2003
↑ ↓ ← → "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:
"Matthew Wilson" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message
news:brs078$2n2g$1 digitaldaemon.com...

 "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in message
 news:brrueh$2kll$1 digitaldaemon.com...

 "Matthew Wilson" <matthew.hat stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message
 news:brrthg$2j61$1 digitaldaemon.com...

 I think I've just determined that DMC++'s make does not handle the




 make syntax:

 {$(UNIXEM_SRC_DIR)}.c{$(UNIXEM_OBJ_DIR)}.obj:
     $(CC) $(CC_ARGS) -I$(UNIXEM_INC_DIR) -o$  $<

 Is this correct?



 Yes.


 If so, do you have a handle on how hard it would be to add? (I know,




 going to tell me to add it myself, aren't you ... <sob, sob>)



 You could use smake <g>.



 Does that do it then, or are you just toying with me ?



I think so. I didn't write smake and rarely use advanced make features.
Dec 18 2003