Home
| Search
| C & C++
| D
| DMDScript
| News Groups
| index
| prev
| next
|
Archives
D Programming
DD.gnu digitalmars.D digitalmars.D.bugs digitalmars.D.dtl digitalmars.D.dwt digitalmars.D.announce digitalmars.D.learn digitalmars.D.debugger C/C++ Programming
c++c++.announce c++.atl c++.beta c++.chat c++.command-line c++.dos c++.dos.16-bits c++.dos.32-bits c++.idde c++.mfc c++.rtl c++.stl c++.stl.hp c++.stl.port c++.stl.sgi c++.stlsoft c++.windows c++.windows.16-bits c++.windows.32-bits c++.wxwindows digitalmars.empire digitalmars.DMDScript |
c++ - Warnings
I'm build with -wx, but am getting "absolute_path_test\absolute_path_test.cpp(40) : Warning 18: implied return of __uninitialized_copy_aux at closing '}' does not return value" which is killing my build. Without changing STLs or editing the STL that comes with the compiler, I need to get rid of this warning. Is there a way to specify to the compiler to suppress certain warnings? TAI Matthew Jun 28 2003
In article <bdlqba$2enr$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Matthew Wilson says...Is there a way to specify to the compiler to suppress certain warnings? Jun 29 2003
Brilliant. Thanks for that. :) (Another case of not seeing the wood for the trees, <blush>) "Richard Grant" <fractal clark.net> wrote in message news:bdn8nm$nr2$1 digitaldaemon.com...In article <bdlqba$2enr$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Matthew Wilson says...Is there a way to specify to the compiler to suppress certain warnings? Jun 29 2003
One other thing ... is there a way to do it in code? Thanks "Richard Grant" <fractal clark.net> wrote in message news:bdn8nm$nr2$1 digitaldaemon.com...In article <bdlqba$2enr$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Matthew Wilson says...Is there a way to specify to the compiler to suppress certain warnings? Jun 29 2003
Uh, fix the code so that it always return a value... :p Sorry, couldn't help myself... Regards, Remko van der Vossen "Matthew Wilson" <matthew stlsoft.org> wrote in message news:bdnn63$17dq$1 digitaldaemon.com...One other thing ... is there a way to do it in code? Thanks "Richard Grant" <fractal clark.net> wrote in message news:bdn8nm$nr2$1 digitaldaemon.com...In article <bdlqba$2enr$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Matthew Wilson says...Is there a way to specify to the compiler to suppress certain warnings? Jun 30 2003
Doing that in my own code doesn't help anyone who then uses the same makefiles for their own downloaded versions of DMC++, with the flawed STL files. If you mean fix the STL files at source, then I guess that's up to Walter ... "Wichetael" <wichetael gmx.net> wrote in message news:bdq5ub$10i5$1 digitaldaemon.com...Uh, fix the code so that it always return a value... :p Sorry, couldn't help myself... Regards, Remko van der Vossen "Matthew Wilson" <matthew stlsoft.org> wrote in message news:bdnn63$17dq$1 digitaldaemon.com...One other thing ... is there a way to do it in code? Thanks "Richard Grant" <fractal clark.net> wrote in message news:bdn8nm$nr2$1 digitaldaemon.com...In article <bdlqba$2enr$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Matthew Wilson says...Is there a way to specify to the compiler to suppress certain Jun 30 2003
How about using STLport instead, I never had any problems with that myself. Regards, Remko van der Vossen. "Matthew Wilson" <matthew stlsoft.org> wrote in message news:bdqf4r$1aar$1 digitaldaemon.com...Doing that in my own code doesn't help anyone who then uses the same makefiles for their own downloaded versions of DMC++, with the flawed STL files. If you mean fix the STL files at source, then I guess that's up to Walter ... "Wichetael" <wichetael gmx.net> wrote in message news:bdq5ub$10i5$1 digitaldaemon.com...Uh, fix the code so that it always return a value... :p Sorry, couldn't help myself... Regards, Remko van der Vossen "Matthew Wilson" <matthew stlsoft.org> wrote in message news:bdnn63$17dq$1 digitaldaemon.com...One other thing ... is there a way to do it in code? Thanks "Richard Grant" <fractal clark.net> wrote in message news:bdn8nm$nr2$1 digitaldaemon.com...In article <bdlqba$2enr$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Matthew Wilson says...Is there a way to specify to the compiler to suppress certain Jun 30 2003
I do. However I'm currently writing test projects and makefiles for the next release of STLSoft, and they have to be compatible with all reasonable permutations of compilers/libraries. "Wichetael" <wichetael gmx.net> wrote in message news:bdr4jg$20vr$1 digitaldaemon.com...How about using STLport instead, I never had any problems with that Jun 30 2003
Then don't support SGI's STL. Simple! =P "Matthew Wilson" <matthew stlsoft.org> wrote in message news:bdr958$2572$1 digitaldaemon.com...I do. However I'm currently writing test projects and makefiles for the Jul 01 2003
STLSoft supports DMC++, and DMC++ supports SGI & STLport, so STLSoft must do also. "Greg Peet" <admin gregpeet.com> wrote in message news:bdt2r2$u2h$1 digitaldaemon.com...Then don't support SGI's STL. Simple! =P "Matthew Wilson" <matthew stlsoft.org> wrote in message news:bdr958$2572$1 digitaldaemon.com...I do. However I'm currently writing test projects and makefiles for the Jul 01 2003
Maybe DMC++ will begin using STLPort natively rather than SGI =) <winks at Walter> "Matthew Wilson" <matthew stlsoft.org> wrote in message news:bdt3sp$vab$1 digitaldaemon.com...STLSoft supports DMC++, and DMC++ supports SGI & STLport, so STLSoft must Jul 01 2003
Still backwards compatibility to consider ... Stop trying to make my life easier!! Martin the masochist "Greg Peet" <admin gregpeet.com> wrote in message news:bdt7at$133t$1 digitaldaemon.com...Maybe DMC++ will begin using STLPort natively rather than SGI =) <winks at Walter> "Matthew Wilson" <matthew stlsoft.org> wrote in message news:bdt3sp$vab$1 digitaldaemon.com...STLSoft supports DMC++, and DMC++ supports SGI & STLport, so STLSoft Jul 01 2003
"Greg Peet" <admin gregpeet.com> wrote in message news:bdt7at$133t$1 digitaldaemon.com...Maybe DMC++ will begin using STLPort natively rather than SGI =) <winks at Walter> Jul 03 2003
"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:be2jmp$s8s$1 digitaldaemon.com...STLport is not the default because it slows down compilation. Jul 07 2003
"Greg Peet" <admin gregpeet.com> wrote in message news:beb91c$2sau$1 digitaldaemon.com..."Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:be2jmp$s8s$1 digitaldaemon.com...STLport is not the default because it slows down compilation. Jul 07 2003
|