Archives
D Programming
DD.gnu digitalmars.D digitalmars.D.bugs digitalmars.D.dtl digitalmars.D.dwt digitalmars.D.announce digitalmars.D.learn digitalmars.D.debugger C/C++ Programming
c++c++.announce c++.atl c++.beta c++.chat c++.command-line c++.dos c++.dos.16-bits c++.dos.32-bits c++.idde c++.mfc c++.rtl c++.stl c++.stl.hp c++.stl.port c++.stl.sgi c++.stlsoft c++.windows c++.windows.16-bits c++.windows.32-bits c++.wxwindows digitalmars.empire digitalmars.DMDScript |
c++ - make syntax
Walter What are the chances of making the following parse (in the same way some other makes do): OBJS_CPP = \ \ \ .\pch.obj \ .\newdel_w.obj \ .\MLCrtSct.obj \ .\MLSync.obj \ .\MMComBsc.obj \ .\MOBStrFn.obj \ .\MOComFns.obj \ .\MOConnPt.obj \ .\MOConv.obj \ .\MODisp.obj \ .\MOEnBSTR.obj \ .\MOEnGuid.obj \ .\MOEnStr.obj \ .\MOEnUnk.obj \ .\MOEnUnVr.obj \ .\MOEnVar.obj \ .\MOError.obj \ .\MOFTM.obj \ .\MOFTP.obj \ .\MOMemLkB.obj \ .\MOOleStr.obj \ .\MOProp.obj \ .\MOPrpBag.obj \ .\MOPrpPgs.obj \ .\MOPSBuff.obj \ .\MOPsClXX.obj \ # .\MOPsEnXX.obj \ .\MOPSGuid.obj \ # .\MOPsSqXX.obj \ # .\MOPsUnk.obj \ .\MORegLkB.obj \ .\MORegSvr.obj \ .\MOSafeAr.obj \ .\MOStorge.obj \ .\MOStream.obj \ .\MOVar.obj \ .\MWRegUtl.obj \ \ Rather than forcing me to move the stuff around, as in: OBJS_CPP = \ \ \ .\pch.obj \ .\newdel_w.obj \ .\MLCrtSct.obj \ .\MLSync.obj \ .\MMComBsc.obj \ .\MOBStrFn.obj \ .\MOComFns.obj \ .\MOConnPt.obj \ .\MOConv.obj \ .\MODisp.obj \ .\MOEnBSTR.obj \ .\MOEnGuid.obj \ .\MOEnStr.obj \ .\MOEnUnk.obj \ .\MOEnUnVr.obj \ .\MOEnVar.obj \ .\MOError.obj \ .\MOFTM.obj \ .\MOFTP.obj \ .\MOMemLkB.obj \ .\MOOleStr.obj \ .\MOProp.obj \ .\MOPrpBag.obj \ .\MOPrpPgs.obj \ .\MOPSBuff.obj \ .\MOPsClXX.obj \ .\MOPSGuid.obj \ .\MORegLkB.obj \ .\MORegSvr.obj \ .\MOSafeAr.obj \ .\MOStorge.obj \ .\MOStream.obj \ .\MOVar.obj \ .\MWRegUtl.obj \ \ # .\MOPsEnXX.obj \ # .\MOPsSqXX.obj \ # .\MOPsUnk.obj \ I'd be quite happy to do the coding myself. Jun 11 2003
Matthew Wilson schrieb...Walter What are the chances of making the following parse (in the same way some other makes do): OBJS_CPP = \ \ \ [snip] .\MOPSBuff.obj \ .\MOPsClXX.obj \ # .\MOPsEnXX.obj \ .\MOPSGuid.obj \ # .\MOPsSqXX.obj \ # .\MOPsUnk.obj \ .\MORegLkB.obj \ .\MORegSvr.obj \ .\MOSafeAr.obj \ Jun 12 2003
Heinz Saathoff <hsaat bre.ipnet.de> wrote in news:MPG.1952496136b92b249896c1 news.digitalmars.com:Matthew Wilson schrieb...Walter What are the chances of making the following parse (in the same way some other makes do): OBJS_CPP = \ \ \ [snip] .\MOPSBuff.obj \ .\MOPsClXX.obj \ # .\MOPsEnXX.obj \ .\MOPSGuid.obj \ # .\MOPsSqXX.obj \ # .\MOPsUnk.obj \ .\MORegLkB.obj \ .\MORegSvr.obj \ .\MOSafeAr.obj \ Jun 12 2003
Indeed. Sorry if it was not clear, everybody, it just seemed obvious to me (these things always do ...) As for which other makes - both Borland's make.exe (5.6) and Microsoft's (5.0, 6.0, 7.0) accept the syntax, which makes it a lot easier when working one's way through v.large projects that contain multiple errors (as a result of porting from one compiler to another) "gf" <mz_y2k yahoo...com> wrote in message news:Xns9398628E5FC43mzy2kyahoocom 63.105.9.61...Heinz Saathoff <hsaat bre.ipnet.de> wrote in news:MPG.1952496136b92b249896c1 news.digitalmars.com:Matthew Wilson schrieb...Walter What are the chances of making the following parse (in the same way Jun 12 2003
In article <Xns9398628E5FC43mzy2kyahoocom 63.105.9.61>, gf says...Heinz Saathoff <hsaat bre.ipnet.de> wrote in news:MPG.1952496136b92b249896c1 news.digitalmars.com:Matthew Wilson schrieb...Walter What are the chances of making the following parse (in the same way some other makes do): OBJS_CPP = \ \ \ [snip] .\MOPSBuff.obj \ .\MOPsClXX.obj \ # .\MOPsEnXX.obj \ .\MOPSGuid.obj \ # .\MOPsSqXX.obj \ # .\MOPsUnk.obj \ .\MORegLkB.obj \ .\MORegSvr.obj \ .\MOSafeAr.obj \ Jun 12 2003
Sure. I got the point. I wasn't trying to stir up a debate, or indeed score any points; just being a pragmatist (at least that's what I get labelled on DM's newsgroups - which I'm fine with) I wanted a more usable make. :) Walter, as I said, I'm more than happy to make the change if you wish <wichetael gmx.net> wrote in message news:bc9pdl$1a4h$1 digitaldaemon.com...In article <Xns9398628E5FC43mzy2kyahoocom 63.105.9.61>, gf says...Heinz Saathoff <hsaat bre.ipnet.de> wrote in news:MPG.1952496136b92b249896c1 news.digitalmars.com:Matthew Wilson schrieb...Walter What are the chances of making the following parse (in the same way Jun 12 2003
Matthew Wilson schrieb...I wasn't trying to stir up a debate, or indeed score any points; just being a pragmatist (at least that's what I get labelled on DM's newsgroups - which I'm fine with) I wanted a more usable make. :) Jun 12 2003
wichetael gmx.net schrieb...The point Heinz was trying to make is that when \ effetively removes the EOL you get ... .\MOPsClXX.obj # .\MOPsEnXX.obj ... which of course does not count as a comment. What has to be changed is that the comments need to be stripped from the input before the file is actually parsed, or something along those lines. Jun 12 2003
smake or make? "Matthew Wilson" <matthew stlsoft.org> wrote in message news:bc89bt$mi$1 digitaldaemon.com...Walter What are the chances of making the following parse (in the same way some other makes do): Jun 12 2003
make. I've just tried it with smake.exe, and I don't get a makefile syntax error. However, I do get "SMAKE Program Maintenance Utility (Console) Version 7.50 Copyright (c) 1994-1995 Innovative Data Concepts Incorporated Copyright (c) 1994-2001 Digital Mars All Rights Reserved SMAKE fatal error: syntax error: -DWIN32 -wx -c -I..;. -I\Dev\Include;\Dev\IncPriv;\Dev\IncSS;\Dev\Modules\Common\Include -I "p:\Programs\dm\dm\bin\..\include";"p:\Progr ams\dm\dm\bin\..\mfc\include";"p:\Programs\dm\dm\bin\..\stl";H:\STLSoft\Iden tities\STLSoft\stlsoft;P:\PROGRAMS\DM\beta\D M\include;P:\PROGRAMS\DM\beta\DM\include\win32;P:\PROGRAMS\DM\beta\DM\stl;p: \Programs\dm\beta\dm\mfc\INCLUDE; -o.\MODatO bj.obj MODatObj.c": command line too long Stopping. " which is even more terminal. :( "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:bcacrh$206c$1 digitaldaemon.com...smake or make? "Matthew Wilson" <matthew stlsoft.org> wrote in message news:bc89bt$mi$1 digitaldaemon.com...Walter What are the chances of making the following parse (in the same way some other makes do): Jun 13 2003
|