Digital Mars - c++ - 64-bit integer literals bug?

↑ ↓ ← → Mikael Klasson <Mikael_member pathlink.com> writes:

Hi,

it seems dmc just uses the lower 32 bits of my 64-bit integer literals.

long long t = 123456789012345;
gives t the value 123456789012345 mod 2^32 = 2249056121

The compiler doesn't even give a warning.

Digital Mars C/C++ Compiler Version 8.33.13n

Regards,
Mikael

Apr 05 2003

↑ ↓ ← → Christof Meerwald <cmeerw web.de> writes:

On Sat, 5 Apr 2003 13:34:32 +0000 (UTC), Mikael Klasson wrote:
 long long t = 123456789012345;


use
long long t = 123456789012345LL;
instead

 The compiler doesn't even give a warning.


a warning would be nice though.


bye, Christof

-- 
http://cmeerw.org                                 JID: cmeerw jabber.at
mailto cmeerw at web.de

...and what have you contributed to the Net?

Apr 05 2003

↑ ↓ ← → Mikael Klasson <Mikael_member pathlink.com> writes:

use
long long t = 123456789012345LL;
instead


Thanks! You just saved me a lot of hassle.

Cheers,
Mikael

P.S. God I love this compiler... It's soooo fast. :) The most annoying thing I
can think of is the 40MB(?) optlink limit on static data. No fix for that?

Apr 05 2003

↑ ↓ ← → "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:

"Mikael Klasson" <Mikael_member pathlink.com> wrote in message
news:b6mnsa$10ko$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 P.S. God I love this compiler... It's soooo fast. :) The most annoying


 can think of is the 40MB(?) optlink limit on static data. No fix for that?



Kinda stuck with that. Optlink is written entirely in heavilly optimized
assembler, and is a bit immune to any rewrites :-(

Apr 05 2003

↑ ↓ ← → Mikael Klasson <Mikael_member pathlink.com> writes:

Kinda stuck with that. Optlink is written entirely in heavilly optimized
assembler, and is a bit immune to any rewrites :-(


How about that warning for cropped 64-bit literals then? I'm certainly not used
to appending LL, and it seems like a useful warning.

Thanks anyhow,
Mikael

Apr 05 2003

↑ ↓ ← → "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:

"Mikael Klasson" <Mikael_member pathlink.com> wrote in message
news:b6nlpu$1mjg$1 digitaldaemon.com...
Kinda stuck with that. Optlink is written entirely in heavilly optimized
assembler, and is a bit immune to any rewrites :-(


 How about that warning for cropped 64-bit literals then? I'm certainly not


 to appending LL, and it seems like a useful warning.


Years ago, it used to and I removed it. I don't remember why. There was a
reason :-)

Apr 05 2003

↑ ↓ ← → "Matthew Wilson" <dmd synesis.com.au> writes:

Can we have it back? That'd be good. :)

"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in message
news:b6nnj4$1nsg$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 "Mikael Klasson" <Mikael_member pathlink.com> wrote in message
 news:b6nlpu$1mjg$1 digitaldaemon.com...
Kinda stuck with that. Optlink is written entirely in heavilly






assembler, and is a bit immune to any rewrites :-(


 How about that warning for cropped 64-bit literals then? I'm certainly




 used
 to appending LL, and it seems like a useful warning.


 Years ago, it used to and I removed it. I don't remember why. There was a
 reason :-)

Apr 05 2003

↑ ↓ ← → Christof Meerwald <cmeerw web.de> writes:

On Sat, 5 Apr 2003 14:06:02 +0000 (UTC), Mikael Klasson wrote:
 P.S. God I love this compiler... It's soooo fast. :) The most annoying thing I
 can think of is the 40MB(?) optlink limit on static data. No fix for that?


I am currently working on getting OpenWatcom's wlink to work with DMC. So
far, I have it mostly working (just had to fix a few incompatibilities in
wlink's OMF-file processing).

It is able to link programs with more than 40 MB static data (but the
resulting EXE-files are in this case also about 40 MB in size - I hope I can
find an easy way to fix that).

But probably the most exciting feature is that wlink can read COFF libraries
and even Microsoft's new-style COFF import libraries (so you can directly
use Microsoft's Platform SDK import libraries without having to convert
them).

I am going to release my modifications to wlink in the next few days...


bye, Christof

-- 
http://cmeerw.org                                 JID: cmeerw jabber.at
mailto cmeerw at web.de

...and what have you contributed to the Net?

Apr 06 2003

↑ ↓ ← → Christof Meerwald <cmeerw web.de> writes:

On Sun, 6 Apr 2003 13:30:11 +0000 (UTC), Christof Meerwald wrote:
 On Sat, 5 Apr 2003 14:06:02 +0000 (UTC), Mikael Klasson wrote:
 P.S. God I love this compiler... It's soooo fast. :) The most annoying thing I
 can think of is the 40MB(?) optlink limit on static data. No fix for that?




[OpenWatcom's wlink]
 It is able to link programs with more than 40 MB static data (but the
 resulting EXE-files are in this case also about 40 MB in size - I hope I can
 find an easy way to fix that).


Changing the following lines in \dm\src\core32\cinit.asm fixes the problem:

XOF            segment dword use32 public 'BSS'
;               dd      65 dup(0)          ;64 for _atexit_tbl + 1 for null ptr
               org      4 * 65
XOF            ends


 I am going to release my modifications to wlink in the next few days...


It's now available on my Web site at http://cmeerw.org/prog/owtools/


bye, Christof

-- 
http://cmeerw.org                                 JID: cmeerw jabber.at
mailto cmeerw at web.de

...and what have you contributed to the Net?

Apr 06 2003