Home
| Search
| C & C++
| D
| DMDScript
| News Groups
| index
| prev
| next
|
Archives
D Programming
DD.gnu digitalmars.D digitalmars.D.bugs digitalmars.D.dtl digitalmars.D.dwt digitalmars.D.announce digitalmars.D.learn digitalmars.D.debugger C/C++ Programming
c++c++.announce c++.atl c++.beta c++.chat c++.command-line c++.dos c++.dos.16-bits c++.dos.32-bits c++.idde c++.mfc c++.rtl c++.stl c++.stl.hp c++.stl.port c++.stl.sgi c++.stlsoft c++.windows c++.windows.16-bits c++.windows.32-bits c++.wxwindows digitalmars.empire digitalmars.DMDScript |
c++ - Re: Complex numbers for DOSX
Hi Walter, Is it difficult to enable complex number stuff (per C99) in DOSX model either? The only problem you mentioned in CTG is the fact that under DOSX coprocessor may not present. What about enabling complex number feature for DOSX for CPU target 5 (Pentium) and above? Since P5 all processors have FPU integrated. And if not, this is problem of developer to provide system-level support for coprocessor. What do you think? Looking forward for your answer, Nic Tiger. P.S. By the way, using complex numbers with simplicity you provided is great! Dec 26 2002
That means two runtime libraries would have to be supplied. It's doable, but just a lot of work. "Nic Tiger" <nictiger progtech.ru> wrote in message news:aueig0$26ev$1 digitaldaemon.com...Hi Walter, Is it difficult to enable complex number stuff (per C99) in DOSX model either? The only problem you mentioned in CTG is the fact that under DOSX coprocessor may not present. What about enabling complex number feature for DOSX for CPU target 5 (Pentium) and above? Since P5 all processors have FPU integrated. And if not, this is problem of developer to provide system-level support for coprocessor. What do you think? Looking forward for your answer, Nic Tiger. P.S. By the way, using complex numbers with simplicity you provided is great! Dec 27 2002
Do you mean 2 libraries DOSX and WIN32 or you mean DOSX 5+ and 3+ ? I think complex number stuff can be separated in different lib ( complex.lib, e.g.) and the only support is needed is from compiler to compile with -mx -5 (+) using complex. The rest of the standard library will stay unmodified. Am I right? Or something prevents using this way? Nic Tiger. P.S. I have DMC CD with all RTL sources and can help you in porting complex number stuff from WIN32 library to DOSX library. "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> сообщил/сообщила в новостях следующее: news:auj9as$2ik6$2 digitaldaemon.com...That means two runtime libraries would have to be supplied. It's doable, Dec 29 2002
|