www.digitalmars.com Home | Search | C & C++ | D | DMDScript | News Groups | index | prev | next
Archives

D Programming
D
D.gnu
digitalmars.D
digitalmars.D.bugs
digitalmars.D.dtl
digitalmars.D.dwt
digitalmars.D.announce
digitalmars.D.learn
digitalmars.D.debugger

C/C++ Programming
c++
c++.announce
c++.atl
c++.beta
c++.chat
c++.command-line
c++.dos
c++.dos.16-bits
c++.dos.32-bits
c++.idde
c++.mfc
c++.rtl
c++.stl
c++.stl.hp
c++.stl.port
c++.stl.sgi
c++.stlsoft
c++.windows
c++.windows.16-bits
c++.windows.32-bits
c++.wxwindows

digitalmars.empire
digitalmars.DMDScript

c++ - C99 and C0x and Namespaces

↑ ↓ ← Mark Evans <Mark_member pathlink.com> writes:
http://www.cuj.com/experts/2002/sutter.htm

"...There are still some C99 features, however, that C++0x cannot easily adopt
in their C99 form, because conflicting facilities already exist in C++98..."


So right now I would take STL namespace support and let the C99 / C0x stuff
drift a while in its place.  Namespaces are what people use *today*.

Mark
Nov 29 2002
↑ ↓ → "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> writes:
"Mark Evans" <Mark_member pathlink.com> wrote in message
news:as98i7$2853$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 http://www.cuj.com/experts/2002/sutter.htm
 "...There are still some C99 features, however, that C++0x cannot easily

 in their C99 form, because conflicting facilities already exist in

 So right now I would take STL namespace support and let the C99 / C0x

 drift a while in its place.  Namespaces are what people use *today*.

I've been working on the namespace support, it's getting a lot better. ADL lookup is still nowhere, though.
Nov 29 2002