• jm <jm_member pathlink.com> Jun 07 2002
• "Laurentiu Pancescu" <user domain.invalid> Jun 08 2002
• "Matthew Burgess" <ca9mbu eos.sunderland.ac.uk> Jun 28 2002
• Jan Knepper <jan smartsoft.cc> Jun 28 2002

when trying to open up the std namespace the compiler gives me an error. I
simply use 

using namespace std;

and the compiler tells me that std is an undefined identifier

DMC isn't (yet!) compliant.  Actually, it is ARM C++ compliant, so you'll
have to use the old style C++:

#include <iostream>
using namespace std;

must be modified to:

#include <iostream.h>


Laurentiu

"jm" <jm_member pathlink.com> wrote in message
news:adr05h$14o0$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 when trying to open up the std namespace the compiler gives me an error. I
 simply use

 using namespace std;

 and the compiler tells me that std is an undefined identifier

Does anyone know if/when digitalmars will become compliant to the C++
standard (INCITS/ISO/IEC 14882-1998) - at least in terms of supporting std
namespaces and #include <iostream> rather than #include <iostream.h>?  Are
there many other glaringly obvious noncompliant aspects of the compiler?

Thanks,

Matthew Burgess

"Laurentiu Pancescu" <user domain.invalid> wrote in message
news:adtpa8$17ti$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 DMC isn't (yet!) compliant.  Actually, it is ARM C++ compliant, so you'll
 have to use the old style C++:

 #include <iostream>
 using namespace std;

 must be modified to:

 #include <iostream.h>


 Laurentiu

 "jm" <jm_member pathlink.com> wrote in message
 news:adr05h$14o0$1 digitaldaemon.com...
 when trying to open up the std namespace the compiler gives me an error.




 simply use

 using namespace std;

 and the compiler tells me that std is an undefined identifier

These are the two main onces AFAIK.
The compiler is (was) basically compliant to an older standard.
These things, i.e. namespaces and templates is being worked on, however, there
is no release date I am aware of.
Jan



Matthew Burgess wrote:

 Does anyone know if/when digitalmars will become compliant to the C++
 standard (INCITS/ISO/IEC 14882-1998) - at least in terms of supporting std
 namespaces and #include <iostream> rather than #include <iostream.h>?  Are
 there many other glaringly obvious noncompliant aspects of the compiler?