www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D - port of redo-c to BetterC

reply aquaratixc <disconnectix gmail.com> writes:
Good day! This is my first time working with betterC and for the 
sake of experiment I decided to translate the redo-c 
implementation (https://github.com/leahneukirchen/redo-c) into 
BetterC, but I ran into a number of problems:
1. In the original implementation, there are places where the 
openat function is used (dir_fd, target, O_RDONLY | O_DIRECTORY); 
and I couldn't find a replacement. Are there any options where 
you can get it?
2. Similarly, the dprintf function was not found, which, as I 
understand it, is a non-standard extension. Is there a way to add 
this?
I will also be glad if someone picks up the idea and brings it to 
mind. The current version is here: 
https://github.com/aquaratixc/redo-d/tree/main
Jun 09 2021
next sibling parent Imperatorn <johan_forsberg_86 hotmail.com> writes:
On Wednesday, 9 June 2021 at 21:45:33 UTC, aquaratixc wrote:
 Good day! This is my first time working with betterC and for 
 the sake of experiment I decided to translate the redo-c 
 implementation (https://github.com/leahneukirchen/redo-c) into 
 BetterC, but I ran into a number of problems:
 1. In the original implementation, there are places where the 
 openat function is used (dir_fd, target, O_RDONLY | 
 O_DIRECTORY); and I couldn't find a replacement. Are there any 
 options where you can get it?
 2. Similarly, the dprintf function was not found, which, as I 
 understand it, is a non-standard extension. Is there a way to 
 add this?
 I will also be glad if someone picks up the idea and brings it 
 to mind. The current version is here: 
 https://github.com/aquaratixc/redo-d/tree/main
https://dlang.org/spec/interfaceToC.html
Jun 09 2021
prev sibling next sibling parent reply jfondren <julian.fondren gmail.com> writes:
On Wednesday, 9 June 2021 at 21:45:33 UTC, aquaratixc wrote:
 1. In the original implementation, there are places where the 
 openat function is used (dir_fd, target, O_RDONLY | 
 O_DIRECTORY); and I couldn't find a replacement. Are there any 
 options where you can get it?
 2. Similarly, the dprintf function was not found, which, as I 
 understand it, is a non-standard extension. Is there a way to 
 add this?
In general you can just use the C functions directly, with reference to system manpages, prior interfaces in D repositories (dmd+phobos+druntime are good repos to have around), https://dlang.org/spec/interfaceToC.html , and (until ImportC lands) your system's headers for the right magic numbers. ```d extern(C) nothrow nogc int dprintf(int fd, scope const char* format, ...); extern(C) nothrow nogc int openat(int dirfd, scope const char *pathname, int flags); extern(C) nothrow nogc int openat(int dirfd, scope const char *pathname, int flags, int mode); extern(C) nothrow nogc int close(int fd); import core.sys.posix.fcntl : AT_FDCWD, O_RDONLY; enum O_DIRECTORY = 0x10000; import std.stdio : File, write; void main() { int dir, file; if (-1 != (dir = openat(AT_FDCWD, "test", O_DIRECTORY | O_RDONLY))) { scope(exit) close(dir); if (-1 != (file = openat(dir, "x", O_RDONLY))) { File f; f.fdopen(file, "r"); write("test/x contained: ", f.readln); } } } ```
Jun 09 2021
parent reply aquaratixc <disconnectix gmail.com> writes:
Thank you very much to everyone who answered. That helped. I have 
more questions ... I also ran into this: there is a function 
```redo_ifchange (int targetc, char ** targetv)``` inside which 
the ```char [targetc] skip;``` array is defined; , and as a 
result we get an error like ```redo.d (784): Error: variable 
`targetc` cannot be read at compile time```. it is clear that the 
compiler cannot define a variable at the compilation stage and 
set the dimension from it, but how to solve the question in
Jun 10 2021
parent reply Dennis <dkorpel gmail.com> writes:
On Thursday, 10 June 2021 at 09:53:36 UTC, aquaratixc wrote:
 there is a function ```redo_ifchange (int targetc, char ** 
 targetv)``` inside which the ```char [targetc] skip;``` array 
 is defined;
That's a Variable-length array which D doesn't support. If `targetc` has an upper bound, you can use a static array instead: ```D import core.stdc.stdlib; void redo_ifchange (int targetc, char ** targetv) { char[4096] buf = void; assert(targetc <= buf.length); char* skip = buf.ptr; // code } ``` For larger sizes, you can use heap-allocation: ```D import core.stdc.stdlib; void redo_ifchange (int targetc, char ** targetv) { char* skip = cast(char*) malloc(targetc * char.sizeof); scope(exit) free(skip); // code } ``` And if you really want variable-size stack allocation, you can use `alloca`: ```D import core.stdc.stdlib; void redo_ifchange (int targetc, char ** targetv) { char* skip = cast(char*) alloca(targetc * char.sizeof); // code } ``` Though I don't recommend it.
Jun 10 2021
parent reply aquaratixc <disconnectix gmail.com> writes:
On Thursday, 10 June 2021 at 10:04:38 UTC, Dennis wrote:
 On Thursday, 10 June 2021 at 09:53:36 UTC, aquaratixc wrote:
 there is a function ```redo_ifchange (int targetc, char ** 
 targetv)``` inside which the ```char [targetc] skip;``` array 
 is defined;
That's a Variable-length array which D doesn't support. If `targetc` has an upper bound, you can use a static array instead: ```D import core.stdc.stdlib; void redo_ifchange (int targetc, char ** targetv) { char[4096] buf = void; assert(targetc <= buf.length); char* skip = buf.ptr; // code } ``` For larger sizes, you can use heap-allocation: ```D import core.stdc.stdlib; void redo_ifchange (int targetc, char ** targetv) { char* skip = cast(char*) malloc(targetc * char.sizeof); scope(exit) free(skip); // code } ``` And if you really want variable-size stack allocation, you can use `alloca`: ```D import core.stdc.stdlib; void redo_ifchange (int targetc, char ** targetv) { char* skip = cast(char*) alloca(targetc * char.sizeof); // code } ``` Though I don't recommend it.
Thanks. Its really helpful. However, as I said, there are still questions: in particular, there is one mistake that I could not resolve. When I try to copy, I get an error like this: ``` redo.o:redo.d:function _D4redo13redo_ifchangeFiPPaZv: error: undefined reference to '_D4core3sys5posixQk4wait9WIFEXITEDFNaNbNiNfiZb' redo.o:redo.d:function _D4redo13redo_ifchangeFiPPaZv: error: undefined reference to '_D4core3sys5posixQk4wait11WEXITSTATUSFNaNbNiNfiZi' collect2: ``` although i imported ```core.sys.posix.sys.wait```
Jun 10 2021
parent reply Dennis <dkorpel gmail.com> writes:
On Thursday, 10 June 2021 at 10:23:00 UTC, aquaratixc wrote:
 Thanks. Its really helpful. However, as I said, there are still 
 questions: in particular, there is one mistake that I could not 
 resolve. When I try to copy, I get an error like this: ```
 redo.o:redo.d:function _D4redo13redo_ifchangeFiPPaZv: error: 
 undefined reference to 
 '_D4core3sys5posixQk4wait9WIFEXITEDFNaNbNiNfiZb'
 redo.o:redo.d:function _D4redo13redo_ifchangeFiPPaZv: error: 
 undefined reference to 
 '_D4core3sys5posixQk4wait11WEXITSTATUSFNaNbNiNfiZi'
 collect2: ``` although i imported ```core.sys.posix.sys.wait```
WIFEXITED and WEXITSTATUS are C macros that druntime translates to D functions. Importing only means you expect it to be there at link-time. When compiling with `-betterC`, you don't actually link druntime usually. I think it's easiest to just copy-paste those function definitions from druntime to your own source instead of importing them. Or you can compile with optimizations (e.g. `-inline` for dmd, `-O1` for GDC/LDC) and hope the functions get inlined.
Jun 10 2021
parent Steven Schveighoffer <schveiguy gmail.com> writes:
On 6/10/21 7:21 AM, Dennis wrote:
 On Thursday, 10 June 2021 at 10:23:00 UTC, aquaratixc wrote:
 Thanks. Its really helpful. However, as I said, there are still 
 questions: in particular, there is one mistake that I could not 
 resolve. When I try to copy, I get an error like this: ```
 redo.o:redo.d:function _D4redo13redo_ifchangeFiPPaZv: error: undefined 
 reference to '_D4core3sys5posixQk4wait9WIFEXITEDFNaNbNiNfiZb'
 redo.o:redo.d:function _D4redo13redo_ifchangeFiPPaZv: error: undefined 
 reference to '_D4core3sys5posixQk4wait11WEXITSTATUSFNaNbNiNfiZi'
 collect2: ``` although i imported ```core.sys.posix.sys.wait```
WIFEXITED and WEXITSTATUS are C macros that druntime translates to D functions. Importing only means you expect it to be there at link-time. When compiling with `-betterC`, you don't actually link druntime usually. I think it's easiest to just copy-paste those function definitions from druntime to your own source instead of importing them. Or you can compile with optimizations (e.g. `-inline` for dmd, `-O1` for GDC/LDC) and hope the functions get inlined.
Hm... those probably should be marked pragma(inline, true), but I'm not sure if that will be a complete fix. -Steve
Jun 10 2021
prev sibling parent aquaratixc <disconnectix gmail.com> writes:
Thank you all for your help. I translated the program, and it 
seems I even collected it with the help of the LDC. I understand 
the reasons for Segfault, the project is here: 
https://github.com/aquaratixc/redo-d/blob/main/redo.d
Jun 10 2021