digitalmars.D - DLang and Golang web framework =?UTF-8?B?YmVuY2htYXJrc++8gQ==?=
- zoujiaqing (115/115) May 14 2022 Yesterday I tested the latest version of Fasthttp and Archttp
- ikod (2/12) May 14 2022 Very cool! Will try to play with it.
- electricface (2/16) May 14 2022 I think the example is too simple to make a comparison.
- zoujiaqing (7/27) May 15 2022 These contrast with the system's high concurrency, thread
Yesterday I tested the latest version of Fasthttp and Archttp performance. (In my Debian virtual machine.) * Archttp :8080 * Fasthttp :8081 * LDC 1.27 * Golang 1.18 Archttp: ```D import archttp; void main(string[] args) { Archttp app = new Archttp; app.Bind(8080); app.Get("/", (context) { auto response = context.response(); response.body("Hello, World!"); }); app.Run(); } ``` Fasthttp: ```go package main import ( "fmt" "github.com/buaazp/fasthttprouter" "github.com/valyala/fasthttp" ) func Index(ctx *fasthttp.RequestCtx) { fmt.Fprint(ctx, "Hello world .)") } func main() { router := fasthttprouter.New() router.GET("/", Index) fasthttp.ListenAndServe(":8081", router.Handler) } ``` ```txt Last login: Sat May 14 14:05:58 on ttys012 zoujiaqing mac ~ % wrk -t8 -c100 -d5s --latency http://192.168.119.128:8081 Running 5s test http://192.168.119.128:8081 8 threads and 100 connections Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev Latency 4.59ms 583.21us 11.55ms 74.52% Req/Sec 2.62k 108.28 2.81k 77.45% Latency Distribution 50% 4.53ms 75% 4.90ms 90% 5.30ms 99% 6.17ms 106510 requests in 5.10s, 15.13MB read Requests/sec: 20869.73 Transfer/sec: 2.97MB zoujiaqing mac ~ % wrk -t8 -c100 -d5s --latency http://192.168.119.128:8080 Running 5s test http://192.168.119.128:8080 8 threads and 100 connections Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev Latency 4.60ms 2.06ms 40.65ms 79.75% Req/Sec 2.66k 184.97 2.93k 89.22% Latency Distribution 50% 4.15ms 75% 5.30ms 90% 7.05ms 99% 11.77ms 108005 requests in 5.10s, 11.85MB read Requests/sec: 21165.06 Transfer/sec: 2.32MB zoujiaqing mac ~ % wrk -t8 -c100 -d5s --latency http://192.168.119.128:8081 Running 5s test http://192.168.119.128:8081 8 threads and 100 connections Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev Latency 4.73ms 1.14ms 23.42ms 88.25% Req/Sec 2.56k 208.52 2.92k 83.29% Latency Distribution 50% 4.57ms 75% 4.99ms 90% 5.55ms 99% 9.26ms 103703 requests in 5.10s, 14.74MB read Requests/sec: 20321.51 Transfer/sec: 2.89MB zoujiaqing mac ~ % wrk -t8 -c100 -d5s --latency http://192.168.119.128:8080 Running 5s test http://192.168.119.128:8080 8 threads and 100 connections Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev Latency 4.51ms 1.88ms 22.04ms 77.43% Req/Sec 2.70k 111.17 2.97k 80.88% Latency Distribution 50% 4.12ms 75% 5.23ms 90% 6.85ms 99% 11.00ms 109516 requests in 5.10s, 12.01MB read Requests/sec: 21463.54 Transfer/sec: 2.35MB zoujiaqing mac ~ % ``` At least in my Debian virtual machine Archttp behaves very close to Fasthttp! Even better than Fasthttp! I hope DLang can develop better in the field of microservices in the future. I just released the first test version of Archttp: https://forum.dlang.org/thread/jckjrgnmgsulewnrefpr forum.dlang.org I just passed the test on macOS and Linux! I will continue to optimize Archttp's performance and cross-platform capabilities in the future. We hope you can give us some optimization suggestions to make DLang Web framework performance better.
May 14 2022
On Saturday, 14 May 2022 at 21:42:26 UTC, zoujiaqing wrote:At least in my Debian virtual machine Archttp behaves very close to Fasthttp! Even better than Fasthttp! I hope DLang can develop better in the field of microservices in the future. I just released the first test version of Archttp: https://forum.dlang.org/thread/jckjrgnmgsulewnrefpr forum.dlang.org I just passed the test on macOS and Linux! I will continue to optimize Archttp's performance and cross-platform capabilities in the future. We hope you can give us some optimization suggestions to make DLang Web framework performance better.Very cool! Will try to play with it.
May 14 2022
On Saturday, 14 May 2022 at 22:20:55 UTC, ikod wrote:On Saturday, 14 May 2022 at 21:42:26 UTC, zoujiaqing wrote:I think the example is too simple to make a comparison.At least in my Debian virtual machine Archttp behaves very close to Fasthttp! Even better than Fasthttp! I hope DLang can develop better in the field of microservices in the future. I just released the first test version of Archttp: https://forum.dlang.org/thread/jckjrgnmgsulewnrefpr forum.dlang.org I just passed the test on macOS and Linux! I will continue to optimize Archttp's performance and cross-platform capabilities in the future. We hope you can give us some optimization suggestions to make DLang Web framework performance better.Very cool! Will try to play with it.
May 14 2022
On Sunday, 15 May 2022 at 00:58:13 UTC, electricface wrote:On Saturday, 14 May 2022 at 22:20:55 UTC, ikod wrote:These contrast with the system's high concurrency, thread pooling, and memory optimization. Web framework performance comparisons for all languages were tested in this way. You can go here and study benchmarks: https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarksOn Saturday, 14 May 2022 at 21:42:26 UTC, zoujiaqing wrote:I think the example is too simple to make a comparison.At least in my Debian virtual machine Archttp behaves very close to Fasthttp! Even better than Fasthttp! I hope DLang can develop better in the field of microservices in the future. I just released the first test version of Archttp: https://forum.dlang.org/thread/jckjrgnmgsulewnrefpr forum.dlang.org I just passed the test on macOS and Linux! I will continue to optimize Archttp's performance and cross-platform capabilities in the future. We hope you can give us some optimization suggestions to make DLang Web framework performance better.Very cool! Will try to play with it.
May 15 2022